A Macat Analysis of Tversky's Judgment Under Uncertainty
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £6.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Macat.com
About this listen
Published in 1974 in the journal Science, the article Judgment Under Uncertainty had a profound impact across the social sciences. Two relatively young Israeli psychologists were challenging the leading ideas about human thought. For decades, social scientists had used a mythical figure to describe how humans make decisions: homo economicus. Homo economicus was logical and conscientious. To make a decision, he would evaluate all the options open to him, before choosing the course of action calculated to be to his best advantage.
While several thinkers had pointed out that this character wasn't representative of real human behavior, no one had come up with a better model to explain how humans make decisions. Then along came Tversky and Kahneman. In Judgment Under Uncertainty, they explained how the brain processes information at a subconscious level, profoundly affecting our decision-making without us even being aware of it. Their findings transformed the way we think about decision-making today.
©2016 Macat Inc (P)2016 Macat IncWhat listeners say about A Macat Analysis of Tversky's Judgment Under Uncertainty
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- rv5
- 21-01-17
turgid despitr quality of original ideas
What would have made A Macat Analysis of Tversky's Judgment Under Uncertainty better?
get to original ideas before 50% of narration
What could Dr. Camille Morvan and Dr. William J. Jenkins have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?
stop repeating background information and get to the meat earlier in the onarration
Who might you have cast as narrator instead of Macat.com?
it was what the narrator said not the voice
What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
disappointment and boredom
Any additional comments?
stop repeating names of athors of ideas
stop having multiple levels of headings
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!