Royal Bastards
Illegitimate Children of the British Royal Family
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Royal Bastards
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
John Lee
About this listen
Since 1066, when William the Conqueror took the throne, English and Scottish kings have sired at least 150 children out of wedlock. Many were acknowledged at court and founded dynasties of their own; several of today's dukedoms are descended from them. Others were only acknowledged grudgingly or not at all. In the 20th century, this trend for royals to father illegitimate children continued, but the parentage, while highly probable, has not been officially recognized.
This book is a genuinely fresh approach to British kings and queens, examining their lives and times through the unfamiliar perspective of their illegitimate children. Interviewees include many of their descendants. But beyond personal narratives, it also sheds light on the perennially fascinating topic of sexual habits; the links between politics, power, and patronage; the class system, scandal, and celebrity; and the different expectations we have of men and women.
©2006, 2008 Peter Beauclerk-Dewar and Roger Powell (P)2021 TantorListeners also enjoyed...
What listeners say about Royal Bastards
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall1 out of 5 stars
-
Performance5 out of 5 stars
-
Story1 out of 5 stars
- The Curator
- 28-04-21
Incredibly dull
You might wonder how a book with such a title could be so boring. The clue is that it was originally produced by Debretts so there’s quite a lot of fauning over men who couldn’t keep it in their trousers because they were royalty. Also it’s not clue who the audience might be (it certainly isn’t scandal hungry republicans like me ) but the fact that there is an explanation of who Jack the Ripper was but not of all the awards and letters after names. Mostly it’s just a catalogue. No psychological insight, few anecdotes to give any sense of who anyone really was and a refusal to go beyond those safely dead in libel laws.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
6 people found this helpful