put me to sleep

Jay Bernard has the most boring voice on earth, I struggled with everything he read.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Canterbury Tales

The performances were all excellent and added a great deal to an already strong book. Many thanks to the actors for playing their parts so well.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Painful to listen to

For a classic such as this, it really, really needs experienced readers/voice actors. I couldn't even get through the Knight's Tale.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Unfortunately not worth the wait

I’ve always had a great deal of affection for the Penguin Classics series of books with their enlightening introductory notes and (mainly) splendid translations, so when I saw that Penguin had brought out an audiobook version of the Canterbury Tales I thought it was time to dive in. My expectation was that the audiobook performers would bring about the same level of illumination of the text as I expect from the printed books. Oh, how wrong I was. With the notable exception of Derek Jacobi (who does exceedingly well with three of the Tales) the performances are pedestrian, and in the case of the Knight’s Tale and the Franklin’s Tale, really rather dire. Penguin Classics seem to have come late to the audiobook business and appear in a frightful hurry to populate the catalogue with their output , but they have not done themselves any favours with this disappointing production. If you are looking for an audiobook of the Canterbury Tales, best look elsewhere.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

8 people found this helpful

Disappointing

I chose this version, purely for Derek Jacobi’s sake. I cannot contend that reasoning was wrong…
The ensemble’s performance as a whole however; did not inspire. Perhaps it would have been better in the original English; perhaps easier to raise enthusiasm to read that…

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

pity about the readers

Too many of the readers, with the notable exception of Derek Jacobi, sound like amateurs.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Useful if chapters were named

Since it's a long book and each a story in itself why not name chapters is the Millers tale instead of chapter 5.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Ticking off Chaucer from my list

I’m glad I’ve dipped into Chaucer so I could understand some cultural references. I was wary of the fact that I was listening to a translation, but may have struggled had I gone directly to the Middle English. The person who read the Squire’s Tale had such a flat, dull, serious voice I could barely stay awake. - I wished they’d fluctuated the vocal range to add some spark. Some narrators were better than others. Would be better to have one person read the whole thing as I found the switching of narrators awoke me from my ‘listening dream mode’ and my attention shifted into thoughts to adjusting to the new narrator’s voice and took attention from the story. Having said that, it’s probably a challenge to get it right - they’ve done a better job than I would do. So, I am grateful that Penguin made the effort. I hope a newer version will accept and fix the issues in this first attempt.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Excellent material let down by one poor reader

Overall , this is a great production of The Canterbury Tales. However, one of the readers - Jay Bernard I believe - appears not to be a very skilled voice actor. They sound like a very young person who is artificially deepening their voice for some reason and it was so grating I had to skip over everything they read. The rest of the readers were excellent.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

An Important Job Half Done.

An Important Job Half Done.

It is a national scandal that there is still no complete recording of our greatest, most vigorous and entertaining poem: Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. So it's wonderful to have, at last, at least this version of Coghill's workaday modernisation. The 1950s "translation" is pretty accurate and fluent but misses so much of Chaucer's rich music, humour and verbal vitality that this recording feels like an important job half done. Chaucer really doesn't need to be "modernised". Nobody hearing the original would prefer this version.
That said, Jacobi, who gives us a superb Reeve’s Tale, Merchant’s Tale and Man of Law’s Tale, is worth the price of the whole thing. Why Penguin didn’t commission him to do the whole work is a mystery. We know how well he handles epic narrative from his solo recordings of the Iliad and Vergil. He knows the text inside out, and has the technique to convey every voice individually and excitingly. Above all, he relishes every nuance of the story telling and the rhythmic shape of every paragraph: does full justice to Chaucer’s masterly handling of the rhyming couplet, constantly varying the pace, tone and tempo. This is highly dramatic, persuasive reading of the highest calibre. It’s also very funny!

The other performances are little more and often less than adequate: good clear voices and, except in the Knight's Tale, largely free of inappropriate accents. It would be a very good idea to have a large cast rather than expect a handful of actors to voice 29 pilgrims if the cast were all as strong and familiar with the texts as Jacobi. But the woeful miscasting of this recording, as with a number of Audible productions, leaves a lot to be desired and is often bizarre.
For example, the boisterous, sexual dynamo who is the worldly-wise Wife of Bath sounds on this recording like a naive nun. She certainly doesn’t enjoy the bawdy! Prunella Scales made a superb recording of the tale in the original which you’d have thought the producer would have studied. Many of the other younger readers sound as if they are reading the texts for the first time and there is little understanding of Chaucer’s wonderful characterisation, dramatic shape and far too little variation of pace and tone: just mechanical, often unintelligent sight-reading. They make rhyming couplets sound perfunctory, like doggerel!
The whole thing gets off to a sorry start with, very oddly, Lesley Manville, a fine actress woefully miscast as the middle aged, ironic and slightly dotty Chaucer/Narrator/Harry Bailey. It just doesn’t work because she misses so much of the irony and bite, her light voice simply cannot characterise the sweep of humanity, overwhelmingly male, Chaucer presents us with. She sounds like a rather patronising Sunday school teacher reading unfamiliar material and her delivery is halting and laboured.The magnificent Knight’s Tale suffers from a narrator who struggles to articulate his words and who clearly has no understanding of the Gentil (aristocratic, slightly old-fashioned) Knight who is supposedly telling the story. It’s as if the parts have been allotted at random to a bunch of out of work actors who have had very little coaching in how to read verse and have never got to know the Canterbury Tales at school. The production is seriously under rehearsed. The Millers Tale again suffers from being bland and unaware. The reader has an excellent voice but he just doesn't understand the tale.

So a very mixed bag. : it's a worthwhile undertaking but poorly executed. Let's hope Audible will now commission a complete recording of the original text with Jacobi on his own or with a group of actors who know and relish what is still our most entertaining and greatest poetic achievement. The father of Shakespeare, the grandfather of us all.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

34 people found this helpful