Detailed information of critical events

This is a great book with loads of information that everyone must know especially policymakers.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The Inconvenient Truth

One of the best books I’ve read. Will absolutely stick in the craw of all Arab apologists

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Difficult to review this sort of book

A very interesting, well written, well read, well researched but ultimately one sided take on a complicated topic. It cries out for and deserves a riposte.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

5 people found this helpful

A very heterodox analysis

Robert Spencer has his critics, but he has written an absorbing account of the history of the Palestine region.

To give Spencer his due he cites a lot of sources, if they are accurate he poses a lot of uncomfortable questions that deserve answers.

Not a huge fan of the narration, but there was enough meat in this account to keep me listening.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Completely one-sided

But an important view into Israeli POV. Raises important points on the lack of engagement from the Arab side, the constant challenges they present to peace, despite the goodwill and concrete steps offered by the Israelis and the West in pursuit of peace.

The author pins this on ideology, which is shocking in its content and textual basis.

Much can be challenged in the book, particularly around the lack of empathy for the Palestinians/Arabs who have nothing. It’s not surprising, given the siege mentality of the Israelis and the real threat they constantly face of annihilation, but there is scant recognition of the awful position they’ve been put in - even if they make the worst of that position by supporting terrorism, making war, and then complaining when they lose that war.

Finally, the author has a constant need to challenge everything, so his wider points can get bogged down in what are relatively minor points - making light of important points. That key Muslim negotiators were lying when they said they were friends is one such accusation that stands out - maybe they were, but who doesn’t fake bonhomie to get something done? It’s pedantic at best.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Grim Truths

Not many will like this book. Because much of what he says is true. Destructive delusions or realistic resilience.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Elephant in the room

Clearly explains why there will never be peace when one side is so intolerant and spins the truth for religious gain. Excellent book. Thank you

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Debunked ; Full of Myths and Misinformation

This book is a provocative exploration of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that seeks to challenge mainstream narratives. Only after 2 hours of listening to this book I concluded that I can’t keep listening to this bundle of lies. While the book aims to offer a critical examination of the historical and political complexities surrounding the conflict, it ultimately falls short due to its reliance on misinformation and skewed interpretations.

Spencer's work is characterized by a selective use of evidence and a tendency to cherry-pick facts that align with his predetermined conclusions. Throughout the book, he presents a series of anecdotes, anecdotes, and anecdotes that paint a one-sided picture of the situation, disregarding the nuanced realities on the ground.

Moreover, this book is marred by its propagation of falsehoods and unsubstantiated claims. Spencer frequently cites questionable sources and perpetuates myths that have long been debunked by scholars and journalists. By uncritically repeating these inaccuracies, the book undermines its own credibility and fails to provide readers with a reliable understanding of the conflict.

Furthermore, Spencer's portrayal of the Palestinian people is often dehumanizing and reductive, reducing them to mere caricatures of violence and extremism. This approach not only perpetuates harmful stereotypes but also overlooks the legitimate grievances and aspirations of millions of individuals living under occupation or as refugees.

In conclusion, while "The Palestinian Delusion" may appeal to those already predisposed to a particular ideological viewpoint, it ultimately fails to offer a substantive analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Readers would be better served by seeking out more nuanced and well-researched perspectives that engage with the complexities of the issue in a thoughtful and balanced manner.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Biased Garbage

No wonder Robert Spencer was barred from entering the UK in 2013 by the UK Home Office if this typifies his considered thoughts on a multifaceted and complex problem full of nuance. Good science does not start with a conclusion and then go about finding any and all evidence to support such a premise ... but this is exactly Spencer's modus operandi. Looking for some additional historical context behind the latest terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, I simply could not listen past the end of the first chapter. Worthless junk that appears to wilfully and knowingly contribute to the age-old conflict, not help resolve it through understanding and considered unbiased analysis.

I also found David Colacci's presentation turgid yet boringly lacklustre, a difficult combination!

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful

Very biased and one sided

To get a better understanding of the current conflict it would be better to read the work of Ilan Pappe.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful